Search found 19 matches

Return to advanced search

Re: Robot - MiniRobot

The prongs are actually the L pieces that we find in our toolboxes and are quite sturdy. The problem with the tubes is that the way that the battery is mounted and the way that the motors are mounted makes it very hard to put the tubes in a way that they would hold the robot effectively. Unless wha...
by demeht
March 27th, 2011, 4:12 pm
 
Forum: Logomotion (2011)
Topic: Robot - MiniRobot
Replies: 266
Views: 56544

Re: Robot - MiniRobot

I would still prefer to use tubes as it seems it would be less likely to catch or wobble as much that way. There is not much weight difference either way.
by demeht
March 27th, 2011, 1:18 am
 
Forum: Logomotion (2011)
Topic: Robot - MiniRobot
Replies: 266
Views: 56544

Re: Robot - MiniRobot

I think what Sunny suggested is probably the easiest effective idea. Also consider that we can change the cradle itself rather quickly if we come across any problems once the system is actually built. I'm looking forward to seeing the minibot with magnets on it. And to see it run, basically. I have ...
by demeht
March 25th, 2011, 8:35 pm
 
Forum: Logomotion (2011)
Topic: Robot - MiniRobot
Replies: 266
Views: 56544

Re: Robot - MiniRobot

Here's one...I'm not sure if it would work.

http://www.radioshack.com/product/index ... absetBasic
by demeht
March 24th, 2011, 9:52 pm
 
Forum: Logomotion (2011)
Topic: Robot - MiniRobot
Replies: 266
Views: 56544

Re: Robot - MiniRobot

Sounds good to me. Did Fred use a lathe or somehow do that with magic? Looks awesome.

Sunny - We'll begin work on the deployment as soon as possible. Let's use the one bar mechanism to save weight and space. What is the attachment on the end made out of?
by demeht
March 24th, 2011, 10:59 am
 
Forum: Logomotion (2011)
Topic: Robot - MiniRobot
Replies: 266
Views: 56544

Re: Robot - MiniRobot

Also, why use two magnets? Would that not increase magnetic friction if one would be sufficient?

Sunny - can we start work on the deployment you CADed now, or should we wait until the minibot design is more final?
by demeht
March 23rd, 2011, 8:42 am
 
Forum: Logomotion (2011)
Topic: Robot - MiniRobot
Replies: 266
Views: 56544

Re: Robot - MiniRobot

Since it seems that we have a minibot redesign all but CADed and we're in the process of ordering parts, why don't we have the minbot team begin work on a deployment mechanism (a slightly modified version of what we have - less power and a locking mechanism OR something completely different) and onc...
by demeht
March 22nd, 2011, 1:43 pm
 
Forum: Logomotion (2011)
Topic: Robot - MiniRobot
Replies: 266
Views: 56544

Re: Robot - MiniRobot

Here is an extremely rough sketch of a possible deployment mechanism. The scale is hopelessly off.

http://i.imgur.com/CzOY7.jpg
by demeht
February 17th, 2011, 2:55 pm
 
Forum: Logomotion (2011)
Topic: Robot - MiniRobot
Replies: 266
Views: 56544

Re: Robot - MiniRobot

The cradle and the minibot should comfortably stay below the 18" deployment line, especially because the size restriction for the minibot is a 12" cube. A pneumatic system would probably function as well, but the fundamental idea (horizontally sliding it onto the pole) is the same, so a cr...
by demeht
February 16th, 2011, 12:18 am
 
Forum: Logomotion (2011)
Topic: Robot - MiniRobot
Replies: 266
Views: 56544

Re: Robot - MiniRobot

I agree, but I doubt the robot would fall out onto the field even if the robot did tip, if the cradle is designed the way I'm imagining. If the recess is deep enough and we cut a notch through the middle, it should be almost impossible for the minibot to fall out unless the robot completely falls ov...
by demeht
February 15th, 2011, 10:10 am
 
Forum: Logomotion (2011)
Topic: Robot - MiniRobot
Replies: 266
Views: 56544
Next

Return to advanced search



cron